In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Toyota Grand Highlander achieved a “Good” rating - the highest possible - for its performance in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, demonstrating its excellent capabilities in preventing collisions. The Ford Explorer has not been tested.
The Toyota Grand Highlander’s rear backup camera has a standard washer for maintaining a clear view under various conditions. In contrast, the Ford Explorer does not offer a rear camera washer, meaning its effectiveness relies on manual cleaning by the user when necessary.
Both the Grand Highlander and the Explorer have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, post-collision automatic braking systems, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Grand Highlander is safer than the Ford Explorer:
| |
Grand Highlander |
Explorer |
| |
Front Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
42 |
65 |
| Chest Movement |
.3 inches |
.9 inches |
| Abdominal Force |
64 lbs. |
161 lbs. |
| Hip Force |
199 lbs. |
224 lbs. |
| |
Rear Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
63 |
86 |
| Hip Force |
55 lbs. |
604 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

